An Interview with Michael Dummett: from Analytical Philosophy to Voting Analysis and Beyond

نویسندگان

  • Rudolf Fara
  • Maurice Salles
چکیده

Social choice and welfare economics are subjects at the frontier of many disciplines. Even if economics played the major rôle in their development, sociology, psychology and, principally, political science, mathematics and philosophy have been central for the manifold inventiveness of the employed methods and for the diversity of the studied topics. This phenomenon can be compared with game theory, a subject which has, of course, many connections with social choice and welfare. This fact is reflected by the disciplinary origins of the contributors to the subject and, as an anecdote, by the disciplinary origins of the board of editors of this journal. Philosophers are expected to contribute mainly to the study of social justice and related ethical questions. But there is a tradition among logicians for studying voting theory. A famous example is C. L. Dodgson (Lewis Carroll), even though the complete works of Dodgson on voting occupy only a few pages. A major recent example is Michael Dummett. Michael Dummett is famous among social choice theorists for his joint paper with Robin Farquharson published in Econometrica in 1961. Later he wrote two important books on voting (Dummett (1984, 1997); for an overview see Salles (2006)). But it must be outlined that Michael Dummett is also, and above all, one of the greatest contemporary philosophers whose work on the German logician Frege, on intuitionism, realism, anti-realism, justificationism has been central for the development of analytical philosophy in the second part of the last century and in this century (an example is the Symposium in a recent issue of Mind (see Peacocke (2005) and Dummett (2005)). Sir Michael Dummett is Wykeham Professor of Logic emeritus at Oxford University. His interview was conducted at New College, Oxford in September 2004.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Place of Philosophy of Phys- Ics in Physics and Philosophy: a Response to Michael Dummett

The paper is an attempt to react as direct and as close as possible on Dummett’s 2007 paper by addressing his overall theses about bridging the gulfs between philosophers and physicists and between analytical and continental philosophy on the one hand and, on the other hand, picking up a couple of more detailed issues Dummett raises about physics and its philosophy.

متن کامل

Michael Dummett on Social Choice and Voting

Michael Dummett worked on the theoretical aspects of aggregation of individual preferences and on the strategic aspects of voting theory. He also extended Black’s analysis of single-peaked preferences for majority rule to the case of voting games (majority games), offering a greater flexibility for the expression of voters’ preferences. He is also with Donald Saari one of the major advocates of...

متن کامل

Meaning and Dummett’s Austrians

Michael Dummett’s 1987 Bologna lectures, published in German translation as Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie1 and in an enlarged English version in 1993 as Origins of Analytical Philosophy,2 constitute a very minor part of his oeuvre. None of the essays in the 2007 Library of Living Philosophers volume3 mentions them, which is fair enough, since the vast bulk of Dummett’s considerable ach...

متن کامل

The philosophy beyond the polygamy of holy Prophet

Holy prophet’s polygamy has since long been used as a pretext by the orientalists in order to twist the real face of Islamic mission. This issue gave rise to the anti-Islam writers to unfairly misjudge the facts of Islam. Different scholars have dealt with the issue from different latent angles in order to defend the presence of holy Prophet; however, the psychological and sociological angles o...

متن کامل

Comparative Study of the Concept of Justice in the Contemporary Political Philosophy of Islam and the West (With emphasis on Michael Sandel's votes)

The idea of Communitarianism with epistemic teachings, such as politics as virtue, the priority of good faith, respect for the cultural diversity of societies, is one of the most prominent intellectual currents of the present age. The hypothesis of this research is that based on the comparative analytical attitude of key societal teachings and the epistemic principles of Islam, one can find com...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Social Choice and Welfare

دوره 27  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006